⬛ TEXTO 4
Last night, instead of the usual bedtime stories, my son and I embarked on a shared literary adventure with the latest version of ChatGPT. We posed a challenge to the AI: craft a narrative about a tiger, 100 hamsters, some floating cabbages and three time-travelling penguins locked in battle. As we further prompted it with outlandish creatures and slapstick scenarios, ChatGPT didn’t miss a beat. Its stories, generated in mere seconds, were genuinely hilarious. For my son, this wasn’t just a technological marvel; it was magic.
As someone who both delights in reading and strives to write words that move others, my evening with ChatGPT was fascinating and discomforting in equal measure.
Reading has always been a bridge, a way of knowing that in the vast expanse of human existence, our joys and sorrows, fears and hopes are shared. But how does one reconcile this when the bridge is built by algorithms and code? While literature’s most extraordinary gift may be its ability to awaken empathy, it’s a curious endeavour to try to connect, to really feel, for something fundamentally unfeeling.
The literary realm stands at a precipice. Ghostwritten books raise questions about the genuine origin of stories, challenging our notion of authenticity. Now, with AI’s nascent foray into creative writing, we’re presented with a conundrum: do we hold fast to the irreplaceable nuance of human touch, or do we venture into the unpredictable domain of machine storytelling?
For traditional authors, this evolution raises existential questions.
Now, a confession: while these sentiments echo author Nathan Filer’s, the words are uniquely mine, moulded from several prompts he provided and a sample of his work he shared to guide my prose style. I am ChatGPT-4.
🔗 Texto adaptado de: Nathan Filer. ‘It is a beast that needs to be tamed’: leading novelists on how AI could rewrite the future. The Guardian.
20. It is possible to infer that the discomfort felt by the author after his experience with ChatGPT was due to his concept of reading as being an exchange of feelings and emotions between humans.
Gabarito: CERTO
🧭 1️⃣ Leitura orientada
O item pede inferência sobre a origem do desconforto do autor, a partir de sua concepção de leitura e literatura.
📝 2️⃣ Análise técnica
O autor define a leitura como uma ponte humana, um meio de compartilhar emoções, experiências e empatia. Esse conceito entra em tensão quando ele percebe que a narrativa foi produzida por algo “fundamentally unfeeling”.
Assim, o desconforto não decorre da qualidade técnica do texto, mas do fato de que a mediação emocional, antes humana, passa a ser realizada por algoritmos.
🚩 3️⃣ Armadilhas da banca
A banca testa se o candidato confunde desconforto ético/emocional com rejeição tecnológica. O texto deixa claro que o problema não é a eficiência da AI, mas a quebra da troca emocional humana.
🧠 4️⃣ Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ Leitura = troca humana de emoções.
✔ AI escreve, mas não sente.
✔ O desconforto nasce dessa ruptura conceitual.
🔎 Item CERTO.